Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Random ramblings from the sunny side of the Alps
Blog Archive
- March 2011 (1)
- November 2010 (1)
- October 2010 (16)
- September 2010 (12)
- August 2010 (30)
- July 2010 (28)
- June 2010 (15)
- May 2010 (29)
- April 2010 (32)
- March 2010 (36)
- February 2010 (31)
- January 2010 (34)
- December 2009 (31)
- November 2009 (30)
- October 2009 (29)
- August 2009 (4)
- July 2009 (2)
- June 2009 (2)
- May 2009 (12)
- April 2009 (22)
- March 2009 (18)
- February 2009 (18)
- January 2009 (19)
- December 2008 (11)
- November 2008 (22)
- October 2008 (14)
- September 2008 (14)
- August 2008 (32)
- July 2008 (31)
- June 2008 (30)
- May 2008 (32)
- April 2008 (31)
- March 2008 (30)
- February 2008 (28)
- January 2008 (32)
- December 2007 (30)
- November 2007 (27)
- October 2007 (25)
- September 2007 (25)
- August 2007 (31)
- July 2007 (9)
6 comments:
Ah it's only impossible if you think it's impossible :)
i did not say impossible, i said almost impossible (and i have an almost clear shot to prove it)
ps - of course, shorter shutter speed would make things easier but then the effect would be lost
Ah so that's what nigh means then LOL. I love the other photo and didn't even know about your photo blog. Needless to say I subscribed immediately. Beautiful photo my friend. :) Both are and I have no idea about shutter speeds LOL.
shutter speed = time of exposure
the shorter the time (like, 1/500s), the more 'frozen' the moving objects in the photo appear and vice versa (this slightly blurry and out of focus pic was taken at about 1/15s)
Sometimes off-focus is the more optimal choice. Depends on what one is trying to accomplish.
Post a Comment